Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M31 has a score of 86.5, which is slightly better than the LG V35 ThinQ's 81.3 global score. Although the Galaxy M31 is newer than LG V35 ThinQ, it is somewhat heavier and thicker. The LG V35 ThinQ features just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy M31, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a higher display pixel density.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M31, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy M31. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core CPU.
Galaxy M31 captures way better photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy M31 also counts with a way larger back camera sensor and a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera.
The Galaxy M31 counts with a much better battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.