Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.5 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M31, with a score of 87.6 against 86.5. The LG V60 ThinQ is a heavier device than the Samsung Galaxy M31, but both of them are equally thin. Both phones in this comparison have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so they should provide the user identical OS features.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy M31, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy M31 features a little sharper display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a little bit greater pixel density.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a superior memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M31, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy M31 captures much better pictures and videos than LG V60 ThinQ. Both of them have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a same size aperture, the same video frame rate, the same resolution camera in the back and a same size sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy M31 counts with greater battery life than LG V60 ThinQ, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.