Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.5 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing is a little bit better than Galaxy M31, with a 91.2 score against 86.5. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS, but the LG Wing has an older 10 version and Galaxy M31 has Android 11 version. Although it's the best in this comparison, LG Wing's design is thicker and heavier than Galaxy M31.
Samsung Galaxy M31 counts with a bit more vivid display than LG Wing, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bit higher number of pixels in each display inch. LG Wing has a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy M31, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG Wing also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
LG Wing captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy M31, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the same camera aperture, a camera with a 64 mega-pixels and a same size back-facing camera sensor, the LG Wing also has higher 60 fps video frame rates. The LG Wing features a superior storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M31, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy M31 counts with a way better battery duration than LG Wing, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.