Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.5 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M31 is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, with a score of 86.5 against 86.3. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy M31 has the previous 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14 version. Samsung Galaxy M31 is better than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro, it must be noted that it's also extremely older, just a bit heavier and just a bit thicker.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a more vivid screen than Galaxy M31, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little larger display, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a really brighter display. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy M31, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Galaxy M31 features a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy M31 features better battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because it has a 6000mAh battery size. The Galaxy M31 captures slightly better photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a tinier sensor and a much tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light photography, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy M31 also counts with a back facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.