Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a bit better than Galaxy M31, having a overall score of 87.1 against 86.5. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra construction is newer and a bit thinner than the Galaxy M31's, but it is just a little heavier. Both phones we are comparing work with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more recent 14 version while Galaxy M31 has Android 11 version.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy M31, because although it has a quite lower display pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a way brighter display and a quite bigger display. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy M31, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy M31 counts with a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy M31, because although it has a back facing camera with a way lower 50 mega pixels resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a way bigger camera sensor shooting lot better quality photographs and videos and a larger aperture.
Galaxy M31 counts with improved battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.