Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-03-05 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy M31 has a global score of 86.5, which is better than the Motorola Moto Z Force's global score of 75.8. These devices include Android operating system, but the Galaxy M31 has older 11 version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. Although Galaxy M31 is noticeably newer than Motorola Moto Z Force, it is thicker and heavier.
The Galaxy M31 has a bit superior processor than Moto Z Force, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a higher number of cores. Moto Z Force has a little bit better screen than Galaxy M31, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a better count of pixels per display inch.
The Moto Z Force has a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy M31, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto Z Force also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy M31 has a very superior camera than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same video definition and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy M31 also has a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
Galaxy M31 features a way better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.