Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.5 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Ocean |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy M31 has a general score of 86.5, which is a little bit better than OPPO Find X2's 79.7 score. These phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy M31 has the newer 11 version while OPPO Find X2 has Android 10. Even though Galaxy M31 is better than OPPO Find X2, we must note that it is also just a little bit heavier and thicker.
OPPO Find X2 counts with a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy M31, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has a larger amount of RAM. The OPPO Find X2 has a more vivid screen than Galaxy M31, because it has a better count of pixels per inch in the screen, way more brightness, a better resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels and a bit larger display.
Galaxy M31 takes a little bit better videos and photos than OPPO Find X2, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting images or videos in low-light situations and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy M31 also counts with a larger sensor which provides a higher image and video quality and a back facing camera with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution.
The OPPO Find X2 has a bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy M31, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy M31 has a way better battery lifetime than OPPO Find X2, because it has a 43% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.