Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.5 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Ocean |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M31 has a general score of 86.5, which is slightly better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro's 83.1 overall score. The Galaxy M31 body has the same thickness than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, but it is a little lighter. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but Galaxy M31 has 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy M31, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy M31, because it has a much brighter screen, a bit larger screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3168px and a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
OPPO Find X2 Pro's camera is very similar to Samsung Galaxy M31's camera, because although the OPPO Find X2 Pro has a back-facing camera with a lot lower resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger sensor providing a better image quality and a bigger aperture to capture better photos and video in low light situations.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a way bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy M31, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy M31 has a much longer battery duration than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has a 41 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.