Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.5 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2021-04-14 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Galactic Silver and Starlight Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 975.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M31 is better than the OPPO Find X3 Neo, with an 86.5 score against 76. These phones include the same Android 11 OS. The Galaxy M31 construction is older, a little bit heavier and thicker than the OPPO Find X3 Neo. The OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy M31, because it has a way brighter display, a just a little more pixels per inch of display, a slightly better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a bit bigger display.
OPPO Find X3 Neo has a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M31, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. OPPO Find X3 Neo features just a bit better performance than Galaxy M31, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy M31 counts with a slightly better camera than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same camera aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy M31 also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution. Galaxy M31 counts with superior battery duration than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.