Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9611 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is a little bit better than the Galaxy M31, with a score of 88.1 against 86.5. These phones include the same Android 11 operating system. Even though the Galaxy F62 is newer than Galaxy M31, it is a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. The Samsung Galaxy M31 counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy F62, and although they both have a 6 GB RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy M31 also has a larger number of cores.
Galaxy F62 has a display that's very similar to the Samsung Galaxy M31 one, because although the Galaxy F62 has a little bit lower screen pixels density, and they both have the same screen brightness, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Galaxy M31 has a little bit better camera than Galaxy F62. They have the same (4K) video definition, the same video frame rates, a 0.59 inches back camera sensor, a same size camera aperture and a 64 mega pixels camera.
The Galaxy F62 features a much better storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M31, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB. The Galaxy F62 has greater battery lifetime than Galaxy M31, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 6000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.