Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.5 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 has an overall score of 89, which is slightly better than Galaxy M31's global score of 86.5. The Galaxy Note10 is a somewhat lighter and thinner phone than Galaxy M31, even when both were released only a few months apart. The Samsung Galaxy M31 counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, a just a bit higher pixel quantity per inch in the screen and a bit bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy M31, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy M31 has a better camera than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light images and videos and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy M31 also counts with a way larger camera sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality and a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Galaxy Note10 features a quite bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy M31, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy M31 counts with a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.