Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.5 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M31, getting an 89.7 score against 86.5. Although the Galaxy S10 Lite and the Samsung Galaxy M31 were released only 1 months apart, the Galaxy S10 Lite is just a bit thinner and a bit lighter. The Samsung Galaxy M31 counts with a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher pixels density.
Galaxy S10 Lite features a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy M31, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy M31 takes just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy M31 also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution, a larger sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality and a bigger camera aperture to take better photos and video in poorly lited situations.
The Galaxy S10 Lite features a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M31, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy M31 counts with better battery duration than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has a 6000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.