Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.5 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.4 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M31, getting a 93.4 score against 86.5. Both devices we are comparing work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 has a newer 13 version while Samsung Galaxy M31 has Android 11 version, so it provides a lot of extra features and better performance. Samsung Galaxy S22's construction is newer, somewhat lighter and thinner than the Samsung Galaxy M31.
The Galaxy S22 counts with a bit superior processor than Galaxy M31, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S22 has a better looking screen than Galaxy M31, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also counts with a little higher screen density and a really brighter display.
The Galaxy M31 counts with a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy S22, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy S22 has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy M31, because although it has a camera in the back with way less MP, and they both have the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also counts with a lot better video quality and a bigger back camera sensor shooting better quality videos and pictures.
The Galaxy M31 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S22, because it has a 62 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.