Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-05 | -- |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 6.74 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue and Red | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better than Galaxy M31, getting a overall score of 90.7 against 86.5. Galaxy S25 Ultra's construction is extremely lighter and way thinner than Galaxy M31. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has a newer 14 version while Galaxy M31 has Android 11 version, offering a couple nice extra features.
Galaxy S25 Ultra features an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy M31, because it has way more brightness, a better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution, a bit bigger display and a little bit better screen density. The Galaxy M31 has a much better processing power than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M31, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Galaxy M31 counts with better battery life than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because it has a 20% more battery size.
Galaxy S25 Ultra captures a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy M31, because it has a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels, a much higher video definition, a much bigger back camera sensor and a bigger aperture to capture better photography in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.