Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.5 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2022-06-29 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M31 has a global score of 86.5, which is much better than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's overall score of 77.6. Samsung Galaxy M31 is an a lot older cellphone than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, but it is lighter and thinner anyway. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy M31 has an older 11 version and Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12.
The Samsung Galaxy M31 features a much better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro. Both have 6 GB of RAM memory and 8 cores. Samsung Galaxy M31 features a more vivid screen than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel amount per screen inch.
Galaxy M31 shoots way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy M31 also has a much more megapixels back camera and a much bigger camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and pictures. Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a way bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy M31, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy M31 has a really longer battery life than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.