Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.5 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-05 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is slightly better than Galaxy M31, having an 88.5 score against 86.5. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version and Galaxy M31 has Android 11 version. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip and the Galaxy M31 were released only 1 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is thinner and a little bit lighter.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy M31, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy M31 counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a just a bit worse pixel density, a little smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M31, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy M31 features a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy M31 counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same aperture and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy M31 also counts with a much more mega-pixels back facing camera and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way higher quality pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.