Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.5 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-05 | -- |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black Shadow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M31, getting a 91.1 score against 86.5. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition's design is thinner but heavier than Samsung Galaxy M31. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has 14 version and Samsung Galaxy M31 has Android 11, giving some additional features and enhanced performance.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a brighter display than Galaxy M31, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1968 x 2184, much more brightness and a bigger screen. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a much greater storage to install games and applications than Galaxy M31, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy M31 features a really superior hardware performance than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Galaxy M31 has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a back facing camera with lot less megapixels resolution, they both have the same diafragm aperture.
The Galaxy M31 features a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.