Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.5 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-05 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M31 is a bit better than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, with a general score of 86.5 against 80.2. These phones have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy M31 has a more recent 11 version and ZTE Axon 10 Pro has Android 10, so it counts with some extra features. The Samsung Galaxy M31 is a newer phone than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro, although it is somewhat thicker and just a bit heavier.
The Galaxy M31 has a bit sharper display than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Galaxy M31 also counts with a just a little greater number of pixels per screen inch. ZTE Axon 10 Pro features much more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy M31, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal storage.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy M31, and although they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy M31 shoots a bit better photos and videos than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low light captures and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy M31 also counts with a much higher resolution camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy M31 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.