Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-06 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Mirage black and Mirage blue | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy M31s has a global score of 88, which is much better than vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 general score. Both phones in this comparison review use the same Android 11 operating system, so both of them should provide the user the same operating system features. Although it's the best we are comparing here, it must be told that it's also older, somewhat thicker and a bit heavier.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a little bit better processing power than Galaxy M31s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy M31s and the vivo X70 Pro both count with quite similar displays, because although the vivo X70 Pro has a bit less pixels per inch in the display and a bit lower 1080 x 2376 resolution, it also counts with a bit larger display.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a camera that's very similar to the Samsung Galaxy M31s one, because although the vivo X70 Pro has a way less MP resolution camera in the back and a worse 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing higher quality photographs and videos and a bigger aperture.
Galaxy M31s has slightly more memory for games and applications than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M31s has greater battery performance than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a 35% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.