Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-06-18 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Midnight blue and Seawater blue | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M40 has an overall score of 85, which is much better than Motorola Droid Turbo's score of 76.4. The Galaxy M40 construction is a lot newer, much thinner and a little bit lighter than Motorola Droid Turbo. These devices have Android OS, but the Galaxy M40 has the previous 10 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M40, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a greater screen pixels density. The Motorola Droid Turbo features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy M40, because although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit.
The Galaxy M40 has a much bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB and more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Droid Turbo features a little longer battery life than Galaxy M40, because it has an 11 percent greater battery size.
The Galaxy M40 takes a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy M40 also has a camera in the back with a lot better resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture and faster video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.