Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-06-18 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Midnight blue and Seawater blue | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M40 has an overall score of 85, which is slightly better than OPPO Find X3 Pro's 79.9 general score. Samsung Galaxy M40's body is lighter and a little thinner than OPPO Find X3 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released around a year before. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy M40 has the older 10 version and OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11.
OPPO Find X3 Pro features just a bit better display than Galaxy M40, because it has a higher pixel density, a higher 1440 x 3216 pixels resolution and a bit bigger display. OPPO Find X3 Pro features a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy M40, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy M40 counts with just a bit more storage capacity to store more games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB. The OPPO Find X3 Pro has greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy M40, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
OPPO Find X3 Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy M40, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a way larger camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photographs, a much more mega-pixels back camera and better 60 fps video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.