Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-06-18 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Midnight blue and Seawater blue | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M40 has a score of 85, which is slightly better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's score of 77.8. The Galaxy M40 is a way older and thicker phone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Samsung managed to build it way lighter anyway. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy M40 has an older 10 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
The Galaxy M40 features a very superior processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy M40, because it has a just a bit higher pixel density, a larger display and a way higher 2200 x 2480 resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots better videos and photos than Galaxy M40, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a back facing camera with way more MP, a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution and a way bigger sensor shooting way better quality photos and videos. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy M40, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better battery performance than Galaxy M40, because it has a 5700mAh battery size instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.