Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 67.5 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.1.2, 4.0.4, 4.0.3, 2.3.5, 2.3.4 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2011-09-01 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.78 x 3.27 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 252.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 800 x 1280 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 285 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.25 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 960 hours standby time 26 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is much better than the Galaxy Note's score of 67.5. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but LG V50 ThinQ has an older 10 version while Galaxy Note has Android 4.1.2. The LG V50 ThinQ is a notably newer and thinner phone than the Galaxy Note, although it's just a bit heavier.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy Note, because it has a lot more pixels per inch of display, a bigger screen and a much higher 1440 x 3120 resolution. LG V50 ThinQ features a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal memory.
LG V50 ThinQ features a quite better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM. The LG V50 ThinQ features a really longer battery life than Galaxy Note, because it has a 60% larger battery capacity.
The LG V50 ThinQ captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note, because it has a lot bigger aperture for better low-light photography and videos, a back facing camera with way more MP and a way higher video resolution.
The LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.