Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.76 | 9.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black and Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1054.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.56 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is better than Motorola DROID Turbo, with a score of 11.76 against 9.8. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's body is newer and way thinner, but also heavier than the Motorola DROID Turbo. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has older 11 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a more vivid screen than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a really smaller display and a bit worse 2560 x 1440 resolution, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of display. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit better performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores and more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures greater photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a way better 7680x4320 video resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photos and a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has just 3900mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Motorola DROID Turbo, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.