Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.76 | 8.97 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.4, 4.4.3, 4.4.2, 4.4, 4.3, 4.2.2 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2013-08-01 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 5.09 x 2.57 x 0.41 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 4.59 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black, Blue, Brown, Green, Red and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1054.00 | $ 165.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 312 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Motorola X8 (Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro MSM8960) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.55 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 10.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 240 hours standby time 13 hours talk time |
| 4.56 | 4.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 11.76, which is much better than Moto X's general score of 8.97. Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way heavier than Moto X, it's much thinner and also a lot newer. These phones use Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has older 11 version while Moto X has Android 4.4.4 version.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a better performance than Motorola Moto X, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and faster) and a greater amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto X, because it has a way higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a lot greater pixel density and a way bigger display.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Moto X, because it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Moto X, because it has a back camera with way more MP, a lot larger camera aperture for better low light captures and video, a way bigger back camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a lot better 7680x4320 video quality.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features just a bit longer battery life than Moto X, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 2200mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto X, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto X. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Moto X, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.