Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-21 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is better than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), with a global score of 98.9 against 84.2. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra design is newer than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018)'s, although it is heavier and just a bit thicker. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little sharper display than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a larger screen, a just a bit higher pixels count per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has just a bit more memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 6 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light captures and video, it also counts with a way higher resolution back facing camera, a way larger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a lot better video definition.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features improved battery performance than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.