Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-08-21 | 2018-08-27 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is much better than Galaxy A8 Star's 82.1 overall score. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the previous 13 version and Galaxy A8 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design is newer than the Galaxy A8 Star's, but it is just a little thicker and just a little bit heavier.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088, more pixels per inch of display and a quite bigger display. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much better video resolution, a lot bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much better resolution back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.