Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than the Galaxy S6 edge+, with a 98.9 score against 79.3. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more recent 13 version while Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra body is way newer than Galaxy S6 edge+'s, although it is a lot heavier and thicker.
Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a little smaller display and a little bit worse 2560 x 1440 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per screen inch. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with much more storage for apps and games than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a larger number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a way better battery life than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a greater camera than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a camera in the back with a lot better 108 mega-pixels resolution, a much better video quality, a larger aperture and a way larger sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs a lot more money than Galaxy S6 edge+, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.