Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 75.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-07-24 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.40 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Alpha grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4315mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is much better than vivo X50 Pro's score of 75.4. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has newer 13 version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10, providing the user a couple nice extra features. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra construction has the same thickness than the vivo X50 Pro, but it's heavier.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit better CPU than vivo X50 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little sharper display than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a better 1440 x 3088px resolution, a quite bigger display and a greater pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a bit better battery life than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 4% bigger battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much better camera than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and video, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a much better 108 mega-pixels resolution, a way better video quality and a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.