Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 75.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is a lot better than vivo X60's global score of 75.1. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version while vivo X60 has Android 11, so it counts with a couple nice extra features. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better cellphone than the vivo X60, we must note that it's also just a little thicker and heavier.
Vivo X60 counts with a processing unit that is very similar to Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's processor, and although the vivo X60 has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little bit better looking screen than vivo X60, because it has a higher display pixel density, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a bit larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes much better videos and photos than vivo X60, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much higher video quality, a back facing camera with a lot higher 108 mega pixels resolution and a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has much more storage capacity to install games and applications than vivo X60, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little better battery duration than vivo X60, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.