Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2020-08-21 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 has a general score of 90.8, which is better than Google Nexus 6P's 80.3 global score. The Galaxy Note 20 design is much newer, but a bit heavier and somewhat thicker than Google Nexus 6P. Galaxy Note 20 counts with a bit better processing unit than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has 5 GB more RAM.
The Google Nexus 6P has a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. Google Nexus 6P has as much storage for apps and games as Samsung Galaxy Note 20, they have the same internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Note 20 takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a back facing camera with less MP, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video quality, a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a bigger camera aperture.
Galaxy Note 20 counts with longer battery duration than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy Note 20 is a lot more expensive than Google Nexus 6P, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.