Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a general score of 90.8, which is much better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 general score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a little bit heavier than the Motorola Droid Turbo, it's way thinner and also incredibly newer. Galaxy Note 20 counts with just a little better performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with 5 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a better pixels number in each inch of display. The Galaxy Note 20 has a way bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a way lower 12 mega pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a way better video resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 4300mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Galaxy Note 20, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola Droid Turbo, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.