Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is better than the Motorola DROID Turbo, having a 90.8 score against 77.9. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a way newer and way thinner device than the Motorola DROID Turbo, although it is also just a bit heavier. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a sharper display than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and more pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy Note 20 counts with a bit superior processor than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with 5 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a bit better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a lot less MP camera in the back, it also counts with a lot better video definition and a bigger aperture to take better photography in low light environments.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a much greater memory for apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 64 GB more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a bit longer battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy Note 20, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Motorola DROID Turbo, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.