Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | TFT |
| 393 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A32, having a 90.8 score against 84.7. Even when Samsung Galaxy Note 20 and the Samsung Galaxy A32 were released only 5 months apart, Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a bit lighter and just a little thinner. The Galaxy Note 20 features just a little better processing power than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a much better display than Galaxy A32, because it has a higher count of pixels per display inch, a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy A32 features a superior memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy A32 features greater battery performance than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4300mAh. The Galaxy A32 features just a bit better camera than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy A32 also has higher 30 fps video frame rates and a back camera with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.