Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2017-07-07 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a score of 80.4, which is a bit better than the Google Nexus 6P's 80.3 general score. Galaxy Note Fan Edition's body is newer and a little bit lighter than the Google Nexus 6P's, although it's also just a bit thicker. Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a little bit better hardware performance than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has 1 GB more RAM memory.
The Google Nexus 6P and Galaxy Note Fan Edition both count with incredibly similar screens, both have a display with the same size, an equal resolution of 1440 x 2560 and the same number of pixels per inch of display. Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a little bit more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 256 GB.
The Google Nexus 6P has just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has an 8 percent bigger battery size. Google Nexus 6P shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light images, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Google Nexus 6P also counts with a bigger sensor providing a better image quality and a better resolution camera in the back.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is also cheaper than the Google Nexus 6P.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.