Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition is slightly better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, having a score of 80.4 against 79.9. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy Note Fan Edition is extremely older than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, it's construction is a little thinner and somewhat lighter. The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a little faster CPU than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
OPPO Find X3 Pro has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a bigger display, a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a bit higher 1440 x 3216px resolution. OPPO Find X3 Pro has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting photos in low light environments, and they both have the same video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a way larger sensor providing a way higher image quality, a much higher resolution camera and better video frame rates.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a really longer battery duration than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.