Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-07-07 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is slightly better than the vivo X60 Pro, having a general score of 80.4 against 78.8. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a incredibly older and just a little thicker cellphone than vivo X60 Pro, but Samsung made it just a bit lighter anyway. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a little more vivid screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Vivo X60 Pro features just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM memory. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
Vivo X60 Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video resolution, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution, faster video frame rates and a bigger sensor.
Vivo X60 Pro features greater battery life than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 31% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.