Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-08-23 | 2019-06-06 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is better than the Motorola Moto Z4, getting an 89 score against 79.8. Even being the best we compare here, it must be told that it's also a just a little heavier and a little thicker cellphone. Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a little more vivid display than Moto Z4, although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280, a just a little lower pixels amount in each display inch and a bit smaller screen.
The Galaxy Note10 features just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note10 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Motorola Moto Z4 counts with just a bit bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB.
Moto Z4 counts with a little better battery duration than Galaxy Note10, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh. The Motorola Moto Z4 captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has worse video frame rates and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Moto Z4 also counts with a much larger back camera sensor and a way more megapixels back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a lot more expensive than Moto Z4, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.