Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2016-08-02 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Black and Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note7 has a general score of 79.5, which is just a bit better than Motorola Droid Turbo's overall score of 76.4. Galaxy Note7's construction is newer, just a little lighter and notably thinner than the Motorola Droid Turbo. The Motorola Droid Turbo has a much better screen than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 2560 x 1440px, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a just a little more pixels per display inch.
Samsung Galaxy Note7 counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has an external memory card slot that allows up to 256 GB and 64 GB internal memory. Motorola Droid Turbo features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy Note7, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has an 11% greater battery size. The Motorola Droid Turbo captures slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light images and video and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a way higher 20.7 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.