Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 514 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 is better than the Honor 50 Pro, with an 87.1 score against 77. The Galaxy Note9 is a incredibly older, a bit heavier and somewhat thicker device than the Honor 50 Pro. The Galaxy Note9 features a little bit better hardware performance than Honor 50 Pro, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a bit sharper display than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit better number of pixels per inch in the screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with just a bit bigger memory to store more apps and games than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The Honor 50 Pro's battery lifetime is just as good as Galaxy Note9's battery life. The Honor 50 Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has slower video frame rates and a much tinier aperture which is not good for taking photos and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.