Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-08-24 | -- |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Black and Epi Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 514 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | -- |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 is much better than the Honor Magic 6 Pro, having an 87.1 score against 76.6. The Galaxy Note9 design has the same thickness than Honor Magic 6 Pro, but it is lighter. Galaxy Note9 has a bit more vivid screen than Honor Magic 6 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1440 x 2960px resolution and a little greater quantity of pixels in each display inch.
The Honor Magic 6 Pro features a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note9, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory capacity. The Honor Magic 6 Pro has a bit faster processor than Galaxy Note9, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Honor Magic 6 Pro also has more RAM memory.
Honor Magic 6 Pro counts with a very superior battery duration than Galaxy Note9, because it has 5600mAh of battery capacity. The Honor Magic 6 Pro takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Honor Magic 6 Pro also has a way larger back-facing camera sensor, a much more mega-pixels camera in the back and a larger camera aperture to capture better low light images and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.