Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-08-24 | -- |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Black and Epi Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 514 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | -- |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 has a global score of 87.1, which is better than the Honor Magic6 Pro's score of 76.6. The Galaxy Note9 design has the same thickness than the Honor Magic6 Pro, but it's lighter. Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a little sharper display than Honor Magic6 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels amount in each screen inch and a quite better 1440 x 2960px resolution.
Honor Magic6 Pro counts with a much bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note9, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Honor Magic6 Pro counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy Note9, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Honor Magic6 Pro also has more RAM memory.
Honor Magic6 Pro counts with a very superior battery performance than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 40% larger battery capacity. The Honor Magic6 Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy Note9, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the Honor Magic6 Pro also has a lot higher resolution back facing camera, a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.