Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 457.00 | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 514 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a general score of 92.1, which is a bit better than Galaxy Note9's score of 87.1. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a heavier cellphone than Galaxy Note9, but they are 0.35inches thick. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1280 x 2800px and a little bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit larger display.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note9, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 1 TB internal memory. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy Note9, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has a 5600mAh battery size. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a better camera than Galaxy Note9, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a larger aperture and a camera in the back with lot more MP.
Although Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy Note9, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy Note9. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy Note9, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.