Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Sky Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 514 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 is better than LG K62, getting an 87.1 score against 78.2. Galaxy Note9 is an a lot older, just a bit thicker and a little heavier cellphone than LG K62. Galaxy Note9 features a more vivid screen than LG K62, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better 1440 x 2960 resolution and a way higher pixels number per screen inch.
LG K62 counts with a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note9, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the LG K62 also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a little faster processing unit than LG K62, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
LG K62 counts with a battery life that's very similar to Galaxy Note9's battery performance. Galaxy Note9 shoots clearer pictures and videos than LG K62, because although it has a much tinier camera sensor capturing less light and washed colors and a way lower resolution camera, it also counts with a way better video definition and a larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.