Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 457.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 514 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note9 is slightly better than LG K92, having a overall score of 87.1 against 85.4. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 design is just a bit lighter than the LG K92, but it is a bit thicker and was released many years before. Galaxy Note9 counts with just a bit better looking display than LG K92, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a higher pixel density.
LG K92 has a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note9, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG K92 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Note9 has just a bit better processing power than LG K92. Both have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
The LG K92 has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the LG K92 also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back camera with a lot higher resolution.
LG K92 has a battery lifetime that is very similar to the Galaxy Note9 one.
Although Galaxy Note9 is a better device, it costs more than the LG K92, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG K92. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy Note9, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the LG K92, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.