Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| 2018-08-24 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 457.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 514 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 has an overall score of 87.1, which is slightly better than the LG V35 ThinQ's 81.3 general score. Even being the best device in this comparison, the Galaxy Note9 construction is much heavier and thicker than LG V35 ThinQ. LG V35 ThinQ and Galaxy Note9 count with quite similar processing units, they have a 6 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little bit lower 1440 x 2880px resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of display. LG V35 ThinQ has a little bit better storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note9, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy Note9 features greater battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 21% more battery size. Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a lot less mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture and a bigger back camera sensor.
Although Galaxy Note9 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V35 ThinQ. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy Note9, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the LG V35 ThinQ, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.