Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2024-06-20 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 457.00 | $ 549.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 514 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 is much better than Motorola Edge (2024), with an 87.1 score against 78.5. Although it's the best phone in this review, Galaxy Note9's design is notably older, heavier and just a little thicker than Motorola Edge (2024). The Motorola Edge (2024) features a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a little bit worse screen density and a way lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
The Galaxy Note9 counts with a way better performance than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy Note9 and the Motorola Edge (2024) feature really similar cameras, because although the Motorola Edge (2024) has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a back camera with a much higher 50 megapixels resolution and a way larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy Note9 has a slightly better memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. Motorola Edge (2024) has improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has a 25 percent more battery capacity.
Galaxy Note9 not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others, which makes it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.