Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 514 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 is much better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, having an 87.1 score against 78.5. Although it's the best we compare here, Samsung Galaxy Note9's design is extremely older, thicker and heavier than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a bit sharper display than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a way worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little lower pixels count in each inch of screen, it also counts with a little bigger screen. Galaxy Note9 has a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy Note9 also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a lot better camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels, a way bigger camera sensor and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a bit better battery duration than Galaxy Note9, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.