Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 514 pixels per inch | 418 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a global score of 87.1, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Neo's general score of 83.1. Although it's the best in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy Note9 is a older, much heavier and somewhat thicker device than the Motorola Edge 30 Neo. Galaxy Note9 features a bit better looking screen than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because it has a little better pixels count in each inch in the screen, a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution and a little larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Neo. They have a 6 GB RAM and the same number of cores. The Galaxy Note9 counts with a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy Note9 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Motorola Edge 30 Neo takes better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light images, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo also counts with higher 120 fps video frame rates and a camera in the back with a lot better resolution.
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo counts with a battery performance that's just as good as Galaxy Note9's battery life, although the Motorola Edge 30 Neo also has a 0 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.