Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.09 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 457.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 514 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has an overall score of 87.1, which is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's overall score of 80.9. Samsung Galaxy Note9's body is extremely older, a little thicker and a bit heavier than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra. Galaxy Note9 has a much better performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with 7 more cpu cores.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen. Galaxy Note9 features much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy Note9 also has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has superior battery duration than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra takes a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a way smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video definition, a much higher resolution camera in the back and a way larger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.